Should reviewers give authors a right of reply to reviews?
If yes, should authors use that right of reply, or is the potential for ugly dramatics too high?
I lean towards "yes" and "no", which now that I look at it is terribly convenient from the perspective of a reviewer. Also, if I really do believe that enough author/reviewer interactions end badly to be worth discouraging the practice, allowing them a right of reply is a fairly unkind action on my part.
Welcome to the new LiveJournal
Some changes have been made to LiveJournal, and we hope you enjoy them! As we continue to improve the site on a daily basis to make your experience here better and faster, we would greatly appreciate your feedback about these changes. Please let us know what we can do for you!